register |  login
› ARVADA
Loading Ad
Visit Other Hubs:
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Tower
Blog
Blog Entry 9 of 27 It is all opinion!
Pedantic responses to an Other's limited view. Be reasonable, see it my way.

Blog Url: http://denver.yourhub.com/~Curtis2

Politics 101
Contributed by: Tom Curtis   on 7/25/2006

The Greek word "polis" ( i.e., city-state) is the origin for the sociological concept of managing scarce resources by a dominant hierarchy that makes decisions for groups from their collective consent -- as in religious, academic, corporate and government entities, generally -- the method of control for all human social interactions. Thomas Hobbes, a 17th-century philosopher (read: "Leviathan"), opined social contracts are developed from exchanging freedom of personal actions for stability and security.

Control is the end result of political action, inhibiting the natural individual desire to be totally free in pursuit of all available life-sustaining resources. Before the Greek example (read: "Republic"), most societies developed from family (tribal) associations, with leadership via some genetic pecking order typical in other species.

Governments exist by reason of an implied contractual agreement with citizens of a society, allowing certain restrictions and rules limiting individual freedom of action. Members of any particular society are constrained by the power of accepted authority, most often through enforcement of rules of conduct.

The basic method of enforcement is fear, intimidation by threat of consequence. The universal problem of government is resolving conflicts in the wills of its constituents, thus (per Hobbes): bellum omnium contra omnes, war of all against all. Plato, Cicero, and Rousseau similarly reduced the concept of government to that state of universal order, for conflict can be observed as basic in nature.

The necessary role of participants in any society is to control the controllers. In modern, post-tribal cultures unions of individual wills have evolved that are directed toward sustaining acceptable codes and standards for both governors and governed. Traditionally, political parties eschew change, seeking to maintain a priori values without redefining newly perceived entitlements of individuals. Thus, political parties become bastions of resistance to renewal of effective priorities for collective social needs. Loyalists hope their particular established path will eventually lead to a beneficial future, despite the human failures in inept authoritarian leadership-hypocrisy, secrecy, lies, fraud, greed and other non-altruistic personal agendas.

In our mixed culture political associations, we are struggling to escape the constraining ideologies of the "left" and "right" extremisms. The terms "left" and "right" have questionable value in the modern world, for they were assigned to members seated in the late 18th-century French assembly. Contemporary "Libertarians" don't fit either definition, for they are classically liberal but reject government regulation of an individual's properties -- very like our country's founders. Generally, "leftists" are considered supporters of socialism, extremes of which are communism and anarchy. The "rightists" tend to sustain an "old order," status quo, religious morality, and oppose whatever social revitalizations are proposed by the Left. As noted above, polarization is a natural condition in achieving balance, whether in politics or physics.

It must follow that some form of moderating conflict must be established, i.e., by "government." To what degree the power to make and enforce rules should be allowed any social organization is the function of politics. Every citizen is a politician, for every individual decides to which rules of society s/he should conform. In our country, most citizens have the option to "control the controllers" -- by voting. "Power to the people!" is not a sterile battle cry, but a call to every society to save itself.

The Libertarian ideal expects all individuals to be responsible for the consequences of their choices, expressed as, "Live, and let live." The proper admonition to a malicious entity is, "What if it were you?" However, we cannot expect utopian standards to prevail, for balance in every sphere of action is the result of conflict. Catch 22: In order to reduce conflict, we must engage in conflict. To do nothing is to accede to whatever conditions may be intolerable. If we wish to limit the power of political decision makers to impinge on our person freedoms, we have to constantly challenge their ordinations.

Politics 101: It's up to YOU.

"Tom Curtis" is a Libertarian Party member who lives in Arvada.


SUBMIT COMMENT

Rate the above blog



Current Rating
Based on 1 user ratings.

Talk Back : submit comments to the blog

*Note: you need to log-in to add a comment or rating.

CONTRIBUTOR INFORMATION

Tom Curtis

Arvada , CO

Tom Curtis has posted 27 blog entries and 0 comments since joining on 2/24/2006. Tom Curtis 's average blog rating is 4.52.
BLOG ENTRY RSS FEEDS
SAVE AND SHARE THIS ITEM

BLOG LIST
WANT TO WRITE FOR YOURHUB.COM?
Want to see the stories you write and the photos you shoot featured in the YourHub.com Thursday print section available all over the Front Range and with home subscriptions of the Rocky Mountain News and The Denver Post? All you have to do is  register,  then post a story or column, start a blog or tell everyonewhat events are happening in town. We will print the best stories, columns, event listings, photos and blog entries in our print sections.

ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad

Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad

This YourHub.com community is produced by The Denver Newspaper Agency
Web Development and Channel Analytics provided by Indigio

terms of use //  privacy policy
the staff //  advertise //  help & faq
buy photos