e-mail:
password:
register
|
login
› ARVADA
SEARCH YOUR HUB:
GO
advanced search
Loading Ad
STORIES
EVENTS
BLOGS
FOR SALE
YELLOW PAGES
PHOTOS
Local Info ›
Home ›
Help ›
Visit Other Hubs:
YourHub.com
Arvada
Aurora
Boulder
Brighton
Broomfield
Castle Pines
Castle Rock
Centennial
Cherry Hills Village
Commerce City
Conifer
Denver
Denver North
Denver South
Edgewater
Englewood
Erie
Evergreen
Federal Heights
Franktown
Glendale
Golden
Green Valley Ranch
Greenwood Village
Highlands Ranch
Lafayette
Lakewood
Littleton
Lone Tree
Longmont
Louisville and Superior
Montbello
Morrison
nights
Niwot
Northglenn
Parker
Roxborough
Sheridan
Thornton
TriTowns
Westminster
Wheat Ridge
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Tower
RECENT STORIES
Jeffco's challenges and choices
(
Melissa Reeves
)
Resolved: Strive for total wellness in 2009!
(
Faith Gregor
)
Training teaches parents to enjoy parenting
(
Jefferson Center for Mental Health
)
Students needed to become agents of change
(
Tiffany Hanson
)
How to save money on your home improvement project
(
Andrea Wilbur
)
share a story
|
more postings
»
YourHub.com
\\
Arvada
\\
Stories
\\
Entertainment
\\
Theater
Who critiques the critic?
e-mail to a friend
|
print this
|
link to this
NEXT ›
‹ PREVIOUS
Contributed by:
Jordan Leigh
on 10/16/2007
Who critiques the critic? Who reviews the reviewer? And who in the heck decided that there ever should have been a job where someone is paid to judge artists? These are the questions I've been pondering the years I've been a theatre professional (ten of those here in my hometown of Denver, including four years in
I Love You, You're Perfect, Now Change
at the Denver Center).
Most recently, this question has come to a head after many conversations I've had with my theatre peers and many other savvy theatre-goers regarding the
Rocky Mountain News
critic
Lisa Bornstein
and how for years now, many of her reviews have done nothing to help this fragile yet surviving art form, and indeed have injured this supportive, creative, tight-knit community. We all think it's about time her reviews were called into question since often times they are mean-spirited and appear to have an agenda about them. Of course, just like these reviews themselves, this editorial is up for debate, and I'd welcome any chance to do so.
The following breaks down a recent review Bornstein wrote on the Arvada Center's recent production of
Ron Hutchinson
's
Moonlight and Magnolias
. Her review can be found archived via the
News
website for cross-references, but I have provided the particular quotes here with which I take issue as Bornstein
states things as facts as opposed to opinions, and since her job (seemingly) is to aid the ticket-buying public in their choices, I do believe it is entirely irresponsible to list such "inaccuracies" (not to mention entirely unfair and cruel to those involved).
Inaccuracy #1:
Bornstein writes: "History has it
Hecht
took 17 days on the script, a short stint, but Hutchinson reduces it to five."
If Bornstein had taken the time to check her "facts," she would have discovered (as those of us involved with the production had) that although there were indeed dramatic liberties taken with how the week of writing ensued (such as turning "seven days" into "five days a working week"), it was precisely a week and not 17 days. She seemingly only checked Internet Movie Database as her source, but the accepted notion (as stated by Hecht himself in his autobiography,
A Child of the Century
) is that it did take a week. Either way, it is wrong to state the other as "fact."
Inaccuracy #2:
"
Erik Sandvold
, as Selznick, acts out the characters, which isn't funny - we all know the story - and doesn't make sense, since he is performing the characterizations that didn't exist until the film was made" (referring to
Gone With the Wind
).
Since production of the film had already been going for three weeks (not to mention innumerable screen tests, etc.), Selznick as producer did indeed know about certain characterizations the actors had come up with. In any case, by reading the book, he could have likely chosen similar characterizations. Not to mention, IT'S A FARCE. SOME SUSPENSION OF DISBELIEF IS IN ORDER...
Innaccuracy #3:
"
James Nantz
, saddled with an ill-defined role whose only characteristics are that he slapped
Judy Garland
and an obscene amount of time delivering the lines of the movie's female characters in a falsetto."
Actually Nantz's character, Victor Fleming, is much more well-defined in the show than Bornstein states. His blue-collar history as a studio driver, his rise to directorial prestige through those very same blue-collar mechanical abilities, the fact that he comes from a Cherokee/German background, and his close relationship with
Clark Gable
are merely a few of the additional character traits that are delved into.
Inaccuracy #4:
"
Jordan Leigh
plays Hecht with ... a New York Jewish accent - puzzling since the script says a half-dozen times the writer was from Chicago (he was born in New York but raised in Wisconsin)."
Puzzling that Bornstein would state something so emphatically without checking her facts once again (or even thinking through the facts that she so cursorily copied down). Indeed, Hecht was a Chicago newspaperman, but he didn't move there until age 16 after he graduated high school and left college. He was raised in Racine, Wisconsin, after spending the first few years of his life in New York, but his primary daily vernacular influence came from his parents, who did indeed spend their lives living in New York and surrounded by what is commonly understood as a "New York Jewish accent." However, all this stated, if Bornstein had done a slight bit of research, she would have discovered (as I had) that there are recordings of the adult Hecht where his dialect can be heard and studied, and although there is indeed a distinct East Coast influence in that patois, his overall "accent" is very specific (including a lisp that came from his pronounced underbite) and I can assure you, I studied it, embodied it, and voiced it with that specific detail.
Despite these printed inaccuracies on Bornstein's part, the most disturbing aspect of her column is how she decidedly states how unfunny the play is. If she is being paid to report what she sees as an aid to potential ticket buyers, I personally find it reprehensible that she wouldn't at least state that the majority of those surrounding her were laughing their proverbial asses off (as have all subsequent audiences since that opening performance).
Doesn't the Arvada Center (an artistic/theatrical gem in this town) and its patrons deserve more respect than this? After all, they buy your paper AND they buy theatre tickets. If I did both and found my theatrical tastes so insulted by your theatre critic, I'd most certainly drop my subscription to your paper and delightedly keep my subscription to the Arvada Center. After all,200 people giving standing ovations every show, eight shows a week, can't ALL be wrong now, can they?
[Report this as objectionable content.]
SUBMIT COMMENT
Rate the above story
Current Rating
Based on 7 user ratings.
Talk Back :
submit comments to the story
*Note: you need to
log-in
to add a comment or rating.
Thank you! Your comment has been updated.
*A comment must be between 1 and 1000 characters.
*Please refrain from using explicit language.
CONTRIBUTOR INFORMATION
Jordan Leigh
Denver
, CO
Jordan Leigh has posted
2
stories and
0
comments since joining on
10/15/2007
. Jordan Leigh 's average story rating is
5
.
view profile »
view other postings from Jordan Leigh »
SAVE AND SHARE THIS STORY
STORY RSS FEEDS
All stories
All stories in Arvada
All stories by Jordan Leigh
WANT TO WRITE FOR YOURHUB.COM?
Want to see the stories you write and the photos you shoot featured in the YourHub.com Thursday print section available
all over the Front Range
and with home subscriptions of the
Rocky Mountain News
and
The Denver Post?
All you have to do is
register
, then post a
story or column
,
start a blog
or
tell everyone
what events are happening in town. We will print the best stories, columns, event listings, photos and blog entries in our print sections.
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad
Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad