register |  login
Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Tower

Meadowood concrete bandaid
Contributed by: Candy Claybaugh on 4/4/2008

Dear Editor:

In February, we found out the Meadowood Neighborhood Association had been established 18 months ago. The board members of the MNA initiated the building of an eight- foot tall masonry block wall, and are in the process of circulating a petition to collect signatures to get this issue on the November ballot.

Several of us who oppose the wall, have canvassed our entire Meadowood neighborhood to get opinions and/or cheaper alternatives. While talking to residents, we discovered that many people have been laid off, some are expecting a possible lay off, and some have been trying to find a job for over a year (barely surviving on a one spouse income). Many of the residents are over 60 years old, retired (not by choice), and are working minimum wage jobs. In this same age group, many are paying for their own medical insurance, since they are not old enough to qualify for Medicare.

There are many medically disabled, and/or physically disabled residents who are not handicapped enough to qualify for the 50% reduction in property taxes offered by the State of Colorado. For those residents who do qualify, we know this reduction can be suspended at any time.

Many residents have paid off their mortgage, live on a fixed income, and struggle to meet the increasing prices of medicines, groceries, utilities, water, and gas. How can they be expected to pay an estimated $32 a month more (or higher based on their property value) for 20 years for a $16 million plus block wall? A 90 foot section (equal to the average length of one back yard) would cost in excess of $65,000. Face it! There are many working people with decent incomes who can't afford this extra expense.

Many residents call this concrete wall the "Berlin Wall," or a "prison wall." Rightly so, as we will no longer be allowed to see over a wall that is 4 inches taller than an average ceiling, or be allowed to receive the sunshine that helps vegetation grow. I call it a "concrete band aid." I feel it is being used to cover up all the wounded homes in this neighborhood so that people driving by will think we are rich, and will start patronizing the nearby businesses.

In reality, while residents pay for the wall, the wounded homes and yards will continue to seep and rot under this bandage. Eventually the residents may be forced to move because they may lose their homes. Empty homes deteriorate without care, just as wounds do without attention.

I can't help but wonder what each of you will think of this concrete wall, when and if any of you end up in the financial predicament these folks are in. Will you think it so great?

The residents, who are able, should have pride and the initiative to repair and/or replace their own fences and keep their yards presentable. Then help your neighbor who may not be able to make his yard presentable, instead of grumbling about the condition of his fence and yard. I feel our yards and fences should be our choice, within reason, as long as they meet City Codes, by keeping them maintained and in good structural condition.

Most of the residents agree that the fences presently surrounding the area are in need of repair and/or replacement, but there are better and less expensive ways to improve the fences without putting such a financial hardship on residents at a time when the economy is in such disarray. Doing so helps no one. I thought the purpose of the MNA was to improve the neighborhood, and help the residents.

Candy Clabaugh

Aurora




SUBMIT COMMENT

Rate the above story



Current Rating

Based on 2 user ratings.

Talk Back : submit comments to the story

*Note: you need to log-in to add a comment or rating.

Showing 1-3 of 3 comments
Submitted By: Richard Guzman
posted on 4/11/2008 @ 8:46:52 PM
(Not Rated)
Submitted By: Richard Guzman I have been a resident of Meadwood since 1976 and have had to replace my fence one time. The reason for this is because I took the time to keep my fence in good order. When I did replace my fence I asked my neighbor's to the right and left to share the cost. The reason I did this is because all of us would benifit from a new fence so it was only fair we share the cost. I do not have a neighbor on the back so I did not ask my neighbors to share the cost of that part of the fence. For this reason I am against the Meadwood fence. Why should I have to pay for a fence I am not required to maintain, build, or get any benifit from. All the people who chose to buy property along the perimeter of Meadwood should be responsible for their fence like my neighbor and myself are. We shouldn't pay for their fare share or up grade their fence for them. This fence is not something that anyone needs, it's only something that a few people want.
Submitted By: Stefani Saxton
posted on 4/10/2008 @ 12:16:14 PM
Rated Story
I agree with Candy. We do need the existing fences improved. Unfortunately, the walls advocated by the Meadowood Homeowners Association and required by the City of Aurora through the fence replacement program are entirely too expensive, too tall, and too ugly. While the MNA and the residents wrangle to decide if one will be built, residents let their fences deteriorate. Why get one now, if they'll have to pay for a more expensive one later? We're shooting ourselves in the foot and the benefit of the resulting wall is inconclusive at best.
Submitted By: Irene Fairweather
posted on 4/9/2008 @ 10:13:37 PM
Rated Story
Dear Editor, In response to the Meadowood Concrete Band-Aid letter: As a 30 year resident of the Meadowood community. I am in agreement that an improvement must be made to the perimeter fence along Chambers Road and bordering areas of Meadowood. However, a $16 million plus block wall is not the answer. There are lesser expensive alternatives that can be put in place. After canvassing the Meadowood community, it is quite evident that the residents of this community cannot bear the cost of a $16 million cement block wall. This would inflict an additional property tax, per resident on an average of $420 per year in 'addition' to the escalating property taxes paid at the present time. Considering the rising costs of necessary expenses and the state of our economy at this time, a $16 million perimeter concrete wall is not at the top of our list of priorities. Irene Fairweather Meadowood Resident
Showing 1-3 of 3 comments
SAVE AND SHARE THIS STORY

STORY RSS FEEDS
WANT TO WRITE FOR YOURHUB.COM?
Want to see the stories you write and the photos you shoot featured in the YourHub.com Thursday print section available all over the Front Range and with home subscriptions of the Rocky Mountain News and The Denver Post? All you have to do is register, then post a story or column, start a blog or tell everyone what events are happening in town. We will print the best stories, columns, event listings, photos and blog entries in our print sections.

ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad

Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad