Search by keyword or six-digit Content ID


What's Hot

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Denver [Change Location]

Analytical report available for Referendum O


DU research center makes it easy for citizens to study November ballot issues beginning with Referendum O

Nov. 4 ballot is the most crowded since 1912 with 18 initiatives

DENVER-Coloradans who don't have time to review all 18 ballot issues in the November election have a place to go to learn more about some of the measures. In the first of three reports, the University of Denver Center for Colorado's Economic Future (CCEF) analyzed the potential impact of Referendum O, which would change the signature requirements and other aspects of the process used by citizens to initiate state statutes and amendments to the Colorado Constitution.

The report, available for download at www.du.edu/economicfuture, compares the provisions of Referendum O to rules governing initiatives in other states and discusses the measure's goal of differentiating the process for placing a constitutional amendment on the ballot from that used to initiate state laws.

"Referendum O was proposed by the state legislature to address problems created by placing increasingly detailed, lengthy and sometimes conflicting provisions into the Colorado constitution through the initiative process" says Charles Brown, director of CCEF. "It's an extremely important issue for voters to study and we developed a report that we hope will help citizens who are interested in learning more about the referendum." Once an amendment is added to the constitution, it cannot be changed without another amendment but statutes may be modified by the legislature.

Colorado, one of 24 states that allow citizens to initiate state statutes or constitutional changes or both, currently has the same requirements for both statutory and constitutional initiatives.

The center was created in 2007 after DU's Colorado Economic Futures Panel (CEFP) completed its work in January 2006. The panel spent more than a year examining the fiscal health of Colorado's state and local governments and their ability to sustain fundamental public investments appropriate to the state's long-term economic vitality. Establishing a permanent center to study the state's economic future was a recommendation from the CEFP.

For further information, contact Jeff Roberts or Phyllis Resnick at (303) 871-7946 or CCEF@du.edu.

Guidelines: Be kind. Abusive commentary may be removed. If you believe someone has been abusive, please click "Report Abuse".

SUBMIT COMMENT
Talk Back : submit comments to the story

*Note: you need to log-in to add a comment or rating.
Thank you! Your comment has been updated.
Showing 1 of 1 comments

Should the South have had veto power over the 13th Amendment, abolishing slavery? What if one Congressional District heavily invested in oil and gas or coal could have blocked Colorado's Amendment 37 ballot initiative, requiring electricity from renewables? If Referendum O passes one District could stop any constitutional initiative. The Secretary of State's “Blue Book” says if O passes “At least 8 percent of the minimum required number of signatures must be collected from each congressional district.” Referendum O moves up the deadline to collect signatures for constitutional initiatives, also making it harder and giving the legislature time to sabotage citizens with a competing initiative, etc. NO on O! Evan Ravitz Founder, http://Vote.org
Showing 1 of 1 comments