Search by keyword or six-digit Content ID


What's Hot

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Lakewood [Change Location]

Developer Backs Referendum to Surrender Parkland


A Canadian development company, Carma, is spending thousands to support a Referendum in Lakewood, CO to ask voters to endorse a trade of public donor-restricted parkland.

Carma, a Canadian development corporation headed byUSoperations manager Tom Morton and Vice President Mike Partheymuller, is spending thousands in support of a campaign called "Vote For Rooney Valley Open Space." With the help ofa PR company ( Peak PR based out of Littleton, www.peakpr.com), a political lobbyist group ( The Kenney Group based out of Denver, www.thekenneygroup.com ), and backed by the elected political powers of the City of Lakewood, Carma is investing heavily in propagating literature to all Lakewood residents to encourage the land exchange.

The exchange that Carma proposes involes almost 22 total acres of a City park called Forsberg's Iron Spring. The park was donated to the City of Lakewood in 1974 by multiple landowner familieswith the expressed intent and deed restriction that the land be held perpetually in the public trust.

A recent decision by council conveyed this land to the Carma development corporation, the City receiving in return 22 acres of the developer's private land on the eastern boundary of the newly proposed residential subdivision.

"As viable land becomes increasingly difficult to acquire and residential development becomes increasingly capital intensive, the competitive landscape is certain to change," says Carma's president Allan Norris in on the corporation's website ( www.carma.ca).

In September, the City ofLakewood was presented with a petition, signed by over 4,000 residents, asking Council to save the City park or submit the decision to a vote of the registered electors. The petitionpassed in terms of sufficiencyand suspended the ordinance until Lakewood voters hadthe opportunity to vote onthe measure.

Despite the weight of the City's power,thefinancialforces of amulti-billion dollar development corporation, and the lobbying/PR power ofhired firms, thecitizens of Lakewood formed an issue committee opposing the land exchange, garnering the support of local media and community activists along the way.

"We're definitely the underdogs in this fight," said Rob Eadie, a resident who's lot sits on the parkin question, "But we're right, and the arguments standalone, with or without the political spin that has beenpropagated by this developer and thevested parties inLakewoodcity politics. We're not going to lose our park."

December 12 marks the date that both issue committee submit their donations and expenses to the Secretary of State via the City Clerk's office. These records are made availablefor public inspection.

City of Lakewood Mayor Steve Burkholder, term-limited in 2007, and City Manager Mike Rock, have publicly endorsed the swap of the public land toCarma, claiming that theexchange supports a City planning document from over 10 years agoto create abuffer zone for adjacent residents to the new subdivision. This planning process had the input of 150 residents, most of whom resided along theeastern boundary of the developer's land. Thisinput representsroughly 1/2% of theCity's currenty population,approximately 150,000 residents in determining the fate of a public park.

Guidelines: Be kind. Abusive commentary may be removed. If you believe someone has been abusive, please click "Report Abuse".

SUBMIT COMMENT
Talk Back : submit comments to the story

*Note: you need to log-in to add a comment or rating.
Thank you! Your comment has been updated.
Showing 1-6 of 6 comments

We prevaied, 57% AGAINST the swap Jan 2, 2007.

No, Golden is where I WORK. Stop trashing people that oppose your view. Stick to the issue. It's important to remember that because of easement set backs, there will STILL be this corridor even without the swap. This is even SHOWN in the developer own ODP plan for the land use! Jane, if you want a copy, call me, 720-933-1840. Don't play games.

Ms. Bertolli needs to understand the hazards of airing her views on YourHub. It's not a newspaper, it's a blog. People are going to disagree, and keep each other accountable. As for trashing others' views, Ms. Bertolli should take a look at her own "stories" and comments before chiding others. And who is not sticking to the issue? If a person doesn't live in Lakewood, yet is so involved in this issue, what would that say about that person? And if someone finds the current "corridor" useful and feels it would be useful in the future, isn't that part of the issue? The plan I have seen for the development doesn't show this corridor, but perhaps I'm not enough of an insider to have seen the REAL one.

I took some time to create a map that clearly shows where the properties are and how the new corridor is created by the use of once private property coupled with public property. You can view the map at http://www.jjesteban.com/ go to the very bottom of the page.

I have read and researched the issues and positions of both proponants and opponents of the proposed land swap between Lakewood and Carma (the developer). All you have to do is look at the map. Which option makes the most sense? If you are like me, the choice is clear. If the transfer passes, not only will I now be able to walk and ride from Coyote Gulch Park all the way to Green Mountain Park, but I will also have access to 80% of the current land that is Iron Springs and Forsberg parks. The parcel the city would acquire would provide an additonal wildlife area connecting Hayden Park and the open space south of Alameda gained in the land swap. Bikers and Hikers would be able extend their walks beyond a small loop around Coyote Park, having the option to continue under a tunnel that connects to Hayden Park (Green Mountain).

I do live in Lakewood and I have concerns about this property trade. The only things I've seen from the pro-trade literature is that there is a land trade, why aren't the pro-trade people more up-front about WHAT is actually being traded for it? If it's such a good deal for me why isn't it right there in their 4 page brochure stating "this is what we are giving up, this is what we are getting"? Instead they make it sound like we are getting the most amazing gift ever and aren't actually giving anything up. Just based on the actions of the pro-trade group it makes me suspicious.
Showing 1-6 of 6 comments