register |  login
Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Tower

Why the property tax increase benefits everyone
Contributed by: Philip Varley on 4/17/2008

In December 2007, I questioned the need for a property tax increase to fund the KCRMD operations. As a professional corporate restructuring executive, I anticipated significant opportunities to reduce expenses.

I reviewed the District's unaudited financial records for 2007 in January 2008.

Below is my opinion.

In general, it appears that KCRMD is managed in a fiscally effective manner. Regarding the payroll, the district's 18 total full-time employees were paid a total of 800 hours overtime, 400 of which went to two recreation staff who absorbed the workload of the recreation director who left and was not replaced. All full-time salaries are within levels for comparable government positions.

I asked an insurance broker I have used for many years to assess the Liability Insurance Policy and was told that it was unlikely that anyone could obtain a better rate.

The recreational programs, such as tennis lessons, are run at a profit and provide additional funds used to maintain our environment.

To residents who allege "waste," I challenge them to provide specific examples. In response to those who would suggest outsourcing of services such as mowing, I would ask them to provide a competitive bid.

For users of the recreational facilities, it's far more cost effective to pay a small, tax deductible increase in property taxes once per year than have to root for cash every time your child wanted a half hour swim.

For those who don't use the swimming pools, the tiny amount of property taxes saved by voting "no" will be lost 1000 times over in the value of our houses when we come to sell. The price of a house is based on one factor alone - demand. When I moved to the Valley 15 years ago, with 2 small children, it was specifically because of the provision of swimming pools and tennis courts by the HOA.

So my conclusion is that to make our environment more pleasant, enjoy the provision of free recreation facilities throughout the year, and increase our property values, vote "yes" to increase the property taxes.

Philip Varley
Ken-Caryl




SUBMIT COMMENT

Rate the above story



Current Rating

Based on 3 user ratings.

Talk Back : submit comments to the story

*Note: you need to log-in to add a comment or rating.

Showing 1-2 of 2 comments
Submitted By: Jeff hale
posted on 4/25/2008 @ 11:08:26 PM
Rated Story
I find it interesting that there's always an identical posting from some kind of web robot named "Jim Wilson" following every letter in favor of preserving Ken-Caryl Ranch! I wish we could stop this kind of spam-machine! Phil: Thanks for the work you put into your analysis of the KCRMD books. I know you approached this very cautiously, but became a supporter after really looking at what the Board has done. Thanks again. Jeff
Submitted By: Jim Wilson
posted on 4/19/2008 @ 1:31:07 PM
(Not Rated)
Phil; How do you justify that the KCRMD has spent over $ 685,000.00 on attorney fees? They could have redirected those dollars to provide services that they were elected to provide as defined in the Service agreement specifically provide, service and maintain 3 pools.
Showing 1-2 of 2 comments
SAVE AND SHARE THIS STORY

STORY RSS FEEDS
WANT TO WRITE FOR YOURHUB.COM?
Want to see the stories you write and the photos you shoot featured in the YourHub.com Thursday print section available all over the Front Range and with home subscriptions of the Rocky Mountain News and The Denver Post? All you have to do is register, then post a story or column, start a blog or tell everyone what events are happening in town. We will print the best stories, columns, event listings, photos and blog entries in our print sections.

ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad

Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad