register |  login
Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Tower

Vote 'no' on 2A in Littleton
Contributed by: Carol Brzeczek on 10/17/2006

Vote No on 2A - A Response to Amy Conklin's Top 10 posted by Rebecca Kast

1. Remove the handcuffs. Response: Defeating 2A does not mean that future excess TABOR revenue cannot be kept. The city can ask the voters to retain any excess when they accrue. This has worked for the past 14 years primarily because the ballot questions in the past have all identified specific projects the money would be used to fund. If the city wanted to keep TABOR revenues for a savings account why didn't they ask that question?

2. Keep Littleton's quality of life competitive. Response: Littleton can ask to remove the cap every few years, just as in the past, and remain competitive. We just want accountability for all excess TABOR revenues.

3. No new taxes. Response: Agreed. However, without the TABOR cap, city fees can be raised without limitation and push us beyond the cap without consequences. The TABOR cap discourages fees from increasing since all excess revenues would have to be put to a vote for retention.

4. Keep your control over taxes. Response: This is a smoke screen. This election is not about a tax increase but whether or not the voters should give up their right to vote on all future excess TABOR revenue and approval of the projects the revenues fund.

5. Littleton has already cut services. Response: Having an annual lease payment over $1,000,000.00 to buy back the museum doesn't help - an example of misplaced priorities. Why did the council enter into an agreement for long-term debt without approval of the voters? The $1,000,000.00 would go a long way in covering some of the services they have cut. It certainly didn't bother them at that time, so why does it now?

6. A proven track record. Response: Yes, there is a proven track record. In the past all TABOR questions have come to the voters with specific time limitations and specific capital projects mentioned in the ballot question. This time the question is very different. We are being asked for the retention and spending of all excess TABOR revenue forever without any mention of how the money will be spent. It is council that is breakingfrom the proven track record.

7. Make growth pay its own way. Response: All new businesses and residents coming to Littleton will increase the assessed valuation of the property in Littleton. This is one of the factors used in determining the TABOR cap. As they move into Littleton the TABOR cap goes up precisely because growth does impact the services a city has to provide. TABOR was created to take the growth into consideration. Not only will the new businesses and residents contribute retail sales tax but general use taxes as well.

8. What the money will buy. Response: Any excess revenues should not be spent on on-going services and the list suggests. Any services that are paid for with excess TABOR revenues will be in jeopardy of not being funded in the years there are no excess revenues collected. In addition the list presented is just the ideas of one council member - they all have their own ideas about how the money should be spent. Remember, they have made no promises as to how the money will be spent. The revenues will be spent however a majority of council decides.

9. Remember Referendum C. Response: A false argument since Referendum C specified how the money would be spent and 2A does not. 2A gives the current and future councils a blank checkbook.

10. Protect our children. Response: It always helps a campaign to mention the children. Another scare and bully tactic that we all should be tired of by now. If Littleton has critical services paid for with TABOR revenues the city is not planning well. See number 8.

Defeating 2A does not mean that future excess TABOR revenue cannot be retained and spent; council can continue to ask anytime they want to ask. But, it would send a message to our elected council that we, the voters in Littleton, still want to have a voice in how the money would be spent. Voting No on 2A protects our right to vote on all future de-TABORing efforts.

Marty and Carol Brzeczek

Click here to go to YourHub.com's Arapahoe County Election Central




SUBMIT COMMENT

Rate the above story



Current Rating

Based on 2 user ratings.

Talk Back : submit comments to the story

*Note: you need to log-in to add a comment or rating.

Showing 1-5 of 5 comments
Submitted By: Carol Brzeczek
posted on 10/26/2006 @ 2:41:21 PM
(Not Rated)
Jenna – So you think people who disagree with leadership do not belong? That to question or challenge the leadership is not a desired quality and to be a good resident we should just “trust” and “respect” the leadership? Are citizens supposed to just accept the status quo and not think for themselves? Does that apply nationwide? So, if you don’t agree with George Bush you should keep quiet and live somewhere else? You may believe that those entrusted have our best interests at heart, but I have never believed in letting someone else do my thinking for me. Not sure what you mean by wasting dollars on needless elections – it was the very leadership you so blindly trust that initiated the election on 2A – an election that they admit is not necessary since there are no excess revenues available. Those leaders you trust so much have been over turned by the voters in the past two ballot issues. Are they really in touch with the citizens of Littleton?
Submitted By: Norm Brown
posted on 10/26/2006 @ 10:29:40 AM
Rated Story
Jena The Germans trusted Hitler. Its an easy way not to bother with ratiional thought. Do a little work, or maybe you could pay the $500 fine your trusted leaders incurred for breaking the Fair Practices campaign Act ...since you trust them so much. Norm Brown
Submitted By: susan price
posted on 10/19/2006 @ 2:34:27 PM
(Not Rated)
Having followed council meetings and the new Complan meetings, I must agree with Carol. We need open, accountable leadership in Littleton. Watch Channel 8 on alternate Tuesdays- if you love Littleton, as do so many of us who have lived here and worked here for years, you can't help but be upset. Vote no on 2A if you care.
Submitted By: David Schwan
posted on 10/19/2006 @ 11:30:03 AM
(Not Rated)
Jena, You are spot on! The City Council "Fab Five" do know a "need" from a "want"! That's right, building a new free Historical Museum was a "need" and expanding the Police Station, especially evidence lockers, was a "want" - right! The "Fab Five" are guilty as charged of ignoring the Complan in order to approve Littleton Village with 900+ new residences in order to make the already terrible traffic worse and to chase every retail possibility to attract more sales tax and, of course, more traffic. How much gridlock do the citizens of Littleton, really want / need ? It's hard to forget that the "Fab Five" continue to undercharge for new Sewer Tap fees so the citizens of Littleton can subsidize development outside the city, i.e. Roxborough. Yep, the "Fab Five" have consistently demonstrated that they can look after all the issues and consistently make decisions which negatively impact the citizens of Littleton.
Submitted By: Jena Dickey
posted on 10/18/2006 @ 7:48:43 AM
Rated Story
Marty and Carol, Well-written, as usual. I just wonder, though, are you running another race? This time for ogre? I really think people like you two don't belong in Littleton. Here we love our town and trust our leaders. We respect them because they know how to take care of our infrastructure, our buildings, and our services. They recognize a need when it is a "need" and not just a "want." They have our best interests at heart, and we have entrusted them with decision-making responsibility accordingly. We don't need to waste tax-payer dollars on needless elections when our officials are perfectly capable of looking at all of the issues. Why is it that you always seem soooooooooooo unhappy? Is Littleton not the right place for you to live?
Showing 1-5 of 5 comments
CONTRIBUTOR INFORMATION

Carol Brzeczek

Littleton , CO

Carol Brzeczek has posted 3 stories and 4 comments since joining on 9/14/2005. Carol Brzeczek 's average story rating is 4.
SAVE AND SHARE THIS STORY
STORY RSS FEEDS
WANT TO WRITE FOR YOURHUB.COM?
Want to see the stories you write and the photos you shoot featured in the YourHub.com Thursday print section available all over the Front Range and with home subscriptions of the Rocky Mountain News and The Denver Post? All you have to do is register, then post a story or column, start a blog or tell everyone what events are happening in town. We will print the best stories, columns, event listings, photos and blog entries in our print sections.

ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad

Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad