e-mail:
password:
register
|
login
› LITTLETON
SEARCH YOUR HUB:
GO
advanced search
Loading Ad
STORIES
EVENTS
BLOGS
FOR SALE
YELLOW PAGES
PHOTOS
Local Info ›
Home ›
Help ›
Visit Other Hubs:
YourHub.com
Arvada
Aurora
Boulder
Brighton
Broomfield
Castle Pines
Castle Rock
Centennial
Cherry Hills Village
Commerce City
Conifer
Denver
Denver North
Denver South
Edgewater
Englewood
Erie
Evergreen
Federal Heights
Franktown
Glendale
Golden
Green Valley Ranch
Greenwood Village
Highlands Ranch
Lafayette
Lakewood
Littleton
Lone Tree
Longmont
Louisville and Superior
Montbello
Morrison
nights
Niwot
Northglenn
Parker
Roxborough
Sheridan
Thornton
TriTowns
Westminster
Wheat Ridge
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Tower
RECENT STORIES
Flag ceremony at Columbine Hills Elementary
(
Juley Allee
)
Celebrate Great Skate Month at South Suburban
(
Jean Ray
)
Developmental educators at ACC for fall conference
(
John Scarffe
)
Flu shots available at free Health Expo Oct. 16
(
Kate Dragoo, Foothills Park & Recreation District
)
Two first-class stamps required for Jeffco ballots
(
Julie Story
)
share a story
|
more postings
»
YourHub.com
\\
Littleton
\\
Stories
\\
Sound Off
\\
Letter to the Editor
Political signs not appropriate in Ken-Caryl
e-mail to a friend
|
print this
|
link to this
NEXT ›
‹ PREVIOUS
Contributed by:
Kathy Tourney
on 5/1/2008
The Ken Caryl Ranch Master Association is in violation of it's covenants that do not allow signs on home owner's association-owned property.
Today there are at least 18 signs for the vote yes campaign only, on our HOA owned properties on Ken Caryl Avenue, Chatfield, and many other high traffic locations.
The MA should be neutral, especially since this tax increase was voted down in November, by a margin of almost 55%, and the people who voted "no" pay HOA dues, too.
This is also a conflict of interest since all the commercial properties in Ken-Caryl Ranch pay dues to the MA, and about 2/3 rds of them are located in Plains Metro District, and are therefore involved in the lawsuit between KCRMD and Plains. So the people in Plains (who are also members of the MA, the umbrella HOA organization) are helping fund the campaign to increase taxes. This is not fair representation. This tax money is used by KCRMD to pay legal fees to fund the lawsuit against Plains. There is also a $112,000 gift the MA will give the KCRMD if the tax increase passes.
The MA is not representing either the commercial property owners, or the home owners who will vote no, who collectively pay the majority of the total dues collected by the MA.
The KCRMA also paid to design, print, and mail postcards to all the people
that pay dues (even those not registered to vote) to the HOA, saying to vote for both of the tax increase initiatives, A and B. Yet they have not formedan issues committee as required by the fair campaign laws. Is this also a mis-appropriation of funds?
I believe these are federal offenses against the fair campaign practices laws and a violation by the MA of the covenants it's very purpose is to enforce.
Is this also a violation of our First Amendment rights to free speech?
The vote yes campaign is also criminally trespassing by removing our vote no campaign signs, alleging that they are on right of ways.
Kathy Tourney
Ken-Caryl
[Report this as objectionable content.]
SUBMIT COMMENT
Rate the above story
Current Rating
Based on 1 user ratings.
Talk Back :
submit comments to the story
*Note: you need to
log-in
to add a comment or rating.
Thank you! Your comment has been updated.
*A comment must be between 1 and 1000 characters.
*Please refrain from using explicit language.
Showing 1-2 of 2 comments
Submitted By: Jeff hale
posted on 5/6/2008 @ 6:05:55 AM
Rated Story
Ms. Tourney, It's well-known what you and your fellow PMD business owners are fighting for!! The cards are stacked against you this time because the FACTS have been communicated. As citizens conclude their voting today, the message will be clear: Let the lawsuit come to its natural conclusion, let the PMD pay back what they took and let our community continue to operate in the way it was designed. I hope that your attacks and vitriol will finally be silenced after the citizens have spoken.
[Report as objectionable]
Submitted By: Jim Wilson
posted on 5/2/2008 @ 2:25:23 PM
(Not Rated)
Kathy; What an accurate and great article. The bias thatis being shown by the MA to the vote yes group only reinforces that the MA is not representing all the home owners. It took the threat of a law suit against the MA board to have them remove the unfair and unethical placement of vote yes signs on HOA property. This isn't the kind of board members I want representing our community. Keep up the good work, we support you.
[Report as objectionable]
Showing 1-2 of 2 comments
SAVE AND SHARE THIS STORY
digg
Google
del.icio.us
Yahoo!
reddit
newsvine
What is this?
STORY RSS FEEDS
All stories
All stories in Littleton
All stories by Rebecca Zimmerman
WANT TO WRITE FOR YOURHUB.COM?
Want to see the stories you write and the photos you shoot featured in the YourHub.com Thursday print section available
all over the Front Range
and with home subscriptions of the
Rocky Mountain News
and
The Denver Post?
All you have to do is
register
, then post a
story or column
,
start a blog
or
tell everyone
what events are happening in town. We will print the best stories, columns, event listings, photos and blog entries in our print sections.
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad
Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad