Blog

YourHub.com \\ Longmont \\ Blogs \\ News & Politics \\ Commentary

Blog Entry 8 of 66 Wrongmont

These are the Longmont stories you may have missed in the local paper, if they ran them at all. I will expand on what was either glossed over or totally ignored - but still may be of interest to you. I encourage citizens to be aware of their local, state, and federal government and to speak up and hold their representatives accountable for their actions - good, bad, or otherwise.

Blog Url: http://denver.yourhub.com/~Wrongmont

Entries:

Freedom of Speech, Unless You Teach

e-mail to a friend | print this | link to this

NEXT › ‹ PREVIOUS

Contributed by: Chris Rodriguez on 4/1/2007

Attached is an image of the Bill Of Rights. I know, some of you have to turn your heads or cover your ears and yell "la la la la", but here, in part, is the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech..."
How might this apply to the recent story of a Longmont teacher under fire? (Daily Times-Call 3/23/07 " Global warming on trial") The newspaper was exercising their "freedom of the press", also part of the First Amendment, in reporting the story. The students were expressing their freedom of speech, in a lively debate and mock trial on this issue. The teacher and CSU student aide were expressing their freedom of speech and agreed that they presented both sides equally. The teacher even explained his neutrality in the classroom on the subject to a parent. So far so good.

The teachers freedom of speech, apparently, has its limits. Even though he threw in the disclaimer " What I think is not the issue. It's what the students dig up and how they present the case", it was the following statement that got all of the attention: " I don't believe in Darwinism..." First thoughts that came to my mind were the lines from a song:" I don't believe in Bible / Jesus / Kings / Elvis / Kennedy." To many, these words are inspired, enlightened phrases, and artists should be protected enough to utter such things freely. Others may find these words, dare I say, religious or spiritual, equally worthy of encouragement and protection. The above citizen was exercising the full range of his First Amendment rights. But this was British subject, non US Citizen (at that time), John Lennon. A true genius, but not a PhD, and definitely not a grade school teacher. Double standard? But I digress.

With that one comment, this teachers detractors pounced and threw out the baby, the bathwater, the bathtub, and the bathroom. The vitriol is beyond belief as it's escalated way past civil disagreement. Are these detractors First Amendment rights covered when it drifts into libel and slander? I won't repeat some of the vile namecalling and attacks on this teacher and his family, you'll just have to trust me or look it up yourself. Oddly, these are the same people that usually scream the loudest for their right of freedom of speech, but you better not disagree with them. I'll also point out that much of this started before the second article ran (Daily Times-Call 3/27/07 " Debunking Darwin"), where the teacher probably sent these people right over the edge.

The attack then switched to a book (and its cover art) the teacher wrote totally outside and separate from his school work. "District standards" (an oxymoron worthy of another discussion) being what they are, make it pretty clear what can and cannot be taught in our government schools. Has there been any evidence that this teacher has brought his outside opinions into the classroom? Appears that he's gone pretty far not to bring his beliefs into the teaching environment. Which brings us back to the First Amendment. Above and beyond these so-called district standards, after covering the material required, are teachers barred from exercising any First Amendment rights? Namely speech and religion? Don't give me the "wall of separation" nonsense, unless you can find that in the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, or Bill of Rights (you can't, it's not there).

The question is which example do we want taught to our children: Keep your mouth shut and follow the rules no matter if they're fair or just? That only certain free speech is acceptable (not including yelling "fire" in a theater of course)? Or that you should get multiple sides to the story, question and debate, and draw your own conclusions? The last example is pretty close to what was reported in the 6th grade debate. It is ironic that this whole episode sprouted from the topic of global warming, only in that many call it the "new religion". Or is that debate also closed for discussion?

Personally, I see a possible First Amendment battle in the making. If not here by this teacher, perhaps somewhere else with another one. First, harm has to be shown to get that ball rolling. Since this teacher is soon retiring, his firing is unlikely. Keep your eye on this subject, it's far from over.

©2007 Chris Rodriguez/Wrongmont.Com
(Chris Rodriguez is a Longmont resident, and the editor and publisher of Wrongmont.Com, a community website that raises local issues to increase public awareness and interest)

< Previous: 'Oops, They Did It Again' | Next: 'A Tax By Any Other Name' >

[Report this as objectionable content.]

SUBMIT COMMENT

Rate the above blog

Current Rating

Based on 2 user ratings.

Talk Back : submit comments to the blog

*Note: you need to log-in to add a comment or rating.

Thank you! Your comment has been updated.

Showing 1-2 of 2 comments

Submitted By: Chris Rodriguez

posted on 4/13/2007 @ 5:24:50 PM

(Not Rated)

"Jefferson's letter", hey, you and I write letters all the time. Granted, we're not Jefferson, but his "letters" aren't policy. If we're going to make policy on past or current president's "letters", we're in a lot of trouble. I give more weight to the Federalists Papers, but they're ignored more than this "letter" if it serves a certain purpose. You can't think teachers ONLY teach what they believe to be true, do you? If so, be prepared to be po'd ;)

[Report as objectionable]

Submitted By: Bing Van Gorden

posted on 4/10/2007 @ 7:51:23 PM

(Not Rated)

I have to disagree slightly with your separation of church and state comment. True enough the phrase does not appear in any of the documents you mentioned. However Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists upon becoming President clearly illustrates that his intepretation of the establishment clause wuite clearly erected a "wall of separation of church and state." And no crime was committed by the teacher. He quite respectfully kept his opinions to himself as he recognized that separation. Freedom of speech is not protected in the work place like it is elsewhere. And obviously if a science teacher has such issues with the curriculum he is required to teach he's going to get re-assigned. Personally I would be majorly po'd if my child was being taught science by someone who doesn't believe it to be true. I'd say he chose the wrong profession if it so greatly conflicts with is conscience.

[Report as objectionable]

Showing 1-2 of 2 comments

CONTRIBUTOR INFORMATION

Chris Rodriguez

Longmont , CO

Chris Rodriguez has posted 66 blog entries and 280 comments since joining on 3/22/2007. Chris Rodriguez's average blog rating is 4.17.

view profile » view other postings from Chris Rodriguez »

SAVE AND SHARE THIS BLOG ENTRY

digg	Google
del.icio.us	Yahoo!
reddit	Newsvine

What is this?

BLOG ENTRY RSS FEEDS

All blog entries

All blog entries in Longmont

All blog entries by Chris Rodriguez

BLOG LIST

WANT TO WRITE FOR YOURHUB.COM?

Want to see the stories you write and the photos you shoot featured in the YourHub.com Thursday print section available all over the Front Range and with home subscriptions of the Rocky Mountain News and The Denver Post? All you have to do is register, then post a story or column, start a blog or tell everyonewhat events are happening in town. We will print the best stories, columns, event listings, photos and blog entries in our print sections.

Loading Ad