register |  login
Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Tower
Blog
Blog Entry 56 of 66 Wrongmont
These are the Longmont stories you may have missed in the local paper, if they ran them at all. I will expand on what was either glossed over or totally ignored - but still may be of interest to you. I encourage citizens to be aware of their local, state, and federal government and to speak up and hold their representatives accountable for their actions - good, bad, or otherwise.

The Twin Peaks Mall Dilemma
Contributed by: Chris Rodriguez   on 2/19/2008

The future of the area in and around what is currently the Twin Peaks Mall has received a lot of attention lately. The Times-Call ran three stories about it in late January, including one about the mall's new owner, Panattoni Development Company. Since the paper, and now recently this company are getting to be regular visitors to my website, figured I'd chime in on this subject that has always interested me.

I grew up in a city that for a while held the record for largest shopping center in the country in the Guinness Book of Records. This was before the advent of the mega-malls, but one day this shopping center decided to enclose and go the mall route. Then it was like any other mall, nothing special really. Prior to this it was sort of a cross between a traditional mall as we now know it, and an open air setup sort of like Centerra in Loveland. What I liked best about it was you knew where each store was and could enter through one door off of the parking lot or through a door in the courtyard on the other side, if you were walking from store to store.

As the mall progressed, all of the outside signage began to disappear, except for the anchor stores. There were less and less exits and entrances. Unless you were a regular, or studied the mall directory map, you wandered around probably more than you had planned just to find what you were looking for. I assume this was no mistake on the part of the mall designers. Put the more popular attractions, like theaters or food courts, in locations that take the longest to get to, and shops along the way got all that foot traffic. It's a scheme that worked for a while, say 25-30 years, but it's time has passed in many cases.

The problem is this: many stores, shops, and kiosks that survive, barely, in a mall just can't cut it outside of a mall. Their entire business model is based on an outdated and obsolete idea (a mall) that in so many cases is being bulldozed and replaced with what apparently people want more. I feel for these entrepreneurs and I have no doubt that they are struggling and worry about the future. It is very likely that if this mall is replaced by something else, some of these businesses will not relocate, they'll just cease to exist.

Hard to blame anyone for this, it's just evolution, survival of the fittest, consequences due to freedom of choice, etc. Malls may have artificially propped up some businesses that really had no long term viability outside of a flea market. I suspect blame will try to be laid at the feet of Internet and "Big Box" Stores, but those wouldn't thrive if there wasn't demand by a lot of people. And obviously there is. You can try to force people into shopping on Main Street or an aging mall, even waste city funds on it, but people want what they want. Either accept and adapt to it, or go the way of the dinosaur and sit around and lament it.

Next up, what to do with the mall area and the gateways in and out of Longmont.

©2008 Chris Rodriguez/Wrongmont.Com
(Chris Rodriguez is a Longmont resident, and the editor and publisher of Wrongmont.Com, a community website that raises local issues to increase public awareness and interest)




SUBMIT COMMENT

Rate the above blog



Current Rating

Based on 4 user ratings.

Talk Back : submit comments to the blog

*Note: you need to log-in to add a comment or rating.

Showing 1-2 of 2 comments
Submitted By: Chris Rodriguez
posted on 2/26/2008 @ 6:19:37 PM
(Not Rated)
I usually say exactly what I mean, and 'fittest' is it. Lets say there's a few widget stores in town, barely scraping by. Another one opens in the mall, keeping in mind none of these are necessarily 'rich'. I've known people like this who had a dream of a certain kind of shop or store, nevermind the already established (and barely surviving) competition. And this was before Walmart came along. As far as this knock on getting 'rich', why would anyone risk all and go into business for themselves to get 'poor'?
Submitted By: Doug Wray
posted on 2/19/2008 @ 7:43:55 PM
Rated Blog Entry
Survival of the 'fittest'? I think you meant 'richest'. It's all about driving your opponent out of business by selling goods he can't afford to buy in the same volume. Sure, it may be evolutionary but there's a lot of dead ends on the evolutionary tree. :-D
Showing 1-2 of 2 comments
CONTRIBUTOR INFORMATION

Chris Rodriguez

Longmont , CO

Chris Rodriguez has posted 66 blog entries and 374 comments since joining on 3/22/2007. Chris Rodriguez's average blog rating is 4.17.
BLOG ENTRY RSS FEEDS
SAVE AND SHARE THIS ITEM

WANT TO WRITE FOR YOURHUB.COM?
Want to see the stories you write and the photos you shoot featured in the YourHub.com Thursday print section available all over the Front Range and with home subscriptions of the Rocky Mountain News and The Denver Post? All you have to do is  register,  then post a story or column, start a blog or tell everyonewhat events are happening in town. We will print the best stories, columns, event listings, photos and blog entries in our print sections.

ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad

Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad