Atthe
3/25/08 Longmont City Council meeting,
Sean McCoy, in his recurring role as appointed insulter, took aim this time at a website. You can see it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNslIi6DAM4
He called them "
surrogate agitators and aggressors", and thanked the
Longmont Police for showing up to the meeting, apparently for "
his and his family's protection." Would this be the same Longmont Police that Mr. McCoy accepted a
$1,000 donation and
Times-Call advertisement from, and are now pushing to make it so they can
never donate to a campaign in Longmont again? Might they have been there because of reports of a regular attendee carrying a good size
knife on him at council meetings? Did this genius know that? I'm betting not.
But since Mr. McCoy is accusing people exercising their
Freedom Of Speech, which include phone or "robo-calls", with terms like this, and feels the need for police protection for these robo-calls, I'd like to ask him for some
consistency.
There were emails sent out that said a similar thing as these robo-calls, "
you need to come to tonight's meeting". These were sent by members of
Progress Now Action, and while it clearly has an
anti-Lifebridge tone, here's the most hilarious part: Some were sent to
current Lifebridge members! In some cases multiple emails sent to separate accounts of the same member! Talk about utter stupidity.
And here it is...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: FW: Your support is needed at a critical time for Longmont
Date: 3/25/2008 1:29:55 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time
From: info@progressnowaction.org
Reply To: jen@progressnowaction.org
XXXX,
Kaye Fissinger, a ProgressNow member in Longmont, asked me to forward you an urgent update on the LifeBridge/4C Development. I've forwarded her email below.
To: Jen Caltrider
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008
From: Kaye Fissinger
Subject: URGENT - We need Longmont residents to attend the City Council meeting TONIGHT
Fellow Longmont Residents,
Earlier this year Longmont residents banded together to prevent a proposed annexation by the LifeBridge/4C Development Corporation. The proposed annexation would have cost Longmont residents thousands in taxpayer dollars every year.
Now, LifeBridge is at it again. This time they're trying to get the land for their development annexed through the City of Firestone.
The Longmont City Council is poised to vote for annexation of three pieces of open space on our Weld County border for use as open space. If Longmont annexes this open space land, we will effectively prevent Firestone from annexing the LifeBridge development and protect wildlife habitat.
I want to invite other Longmont residents to join me at the LongmontCity Council meeting tonight to make sure the City Council knows that Longmont residents want this open space annexed.
The City Council meeting starts at 7:00 pm at City Hall, 350 Kimbark Street in Longmont.
Last night, Longmont residents were subjected to robo calls designed to further LifeBridge's cause. The message urged residents to keep the City Council from annexing the property in question. So, we expect LifeBridge supporters to turn out in force and we need to make sure that Longmont City Council hears our voices as well.
Thanks again. I look forward to seeing everyone tonight at the City Council meeting.
Kaye Fissinger
Longmont Resident
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, now, as the
SNL Church Lady would say, isn't that special? Of all the people who got up and spoke at this meeting, I don't remember seeing a
single Lifebridge supporter. It was a cacophony of the usual anti-Lifebridge crowd. Using Mr. McCoy's
logic and his worrying that the robo-calls would bring out people that meant him harm, in reality, it was the above email that appeared to have more impact based on
who showed up and who spoke. "
Lifebridge is at it again"? "...w
e will prevent Firestone from annexing the Lifebridge development"?
"...make sure the City Council knows..." ? That sounds pretty
accusatory,
negative,
aggressive, and
agitating, possibly
more so than the robo-calls.
Why do I get the feeling Mr. McCoy won't chastise them in the same manner?
Mr. McCoy,
who were you meaning when you said "
and others" during your accusations? Did you mean
Progress Now Action? If you meant them or someone else
you should say it. I'm sure you don't want to appear to be inconsistent or partisan. Cherry picking can be a dangerous and embarrassing thing if you, a) either don't have all the facts, or b) don't know what you're talking about.
©2008 Chris Rodriguez/Wrongmont.Com
(Chris Rodriguez is a Longmont resident, and the editor and publisher of Wrongmont.Com, a community website that raises local issues to increase public awareness and interest)