Search by keyword or six-digit Content ID


What's Hot

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Longmont [Change Location]

Longmont, enforce the Fair Campaign Practice Act!


Roger Lange

Mayor AND

Gordon Pedrow

City Manager

City of Longmont

Longmont, Colorado

Subject: Election Process and Rule of Law

Dear Mr. Mayor,

The integrity of government is 100% dependent upon open non-hypocritical administration of the election process. When the legal process, interpretation of the law and making of the law is 100% controlled and maintained by the people in office to replace themselves or keep themselves in office Longmont no longer has a Constitutional process for elections.

Councilman Hansen and Council candidate Juday clearly are in violation of the letter and spirit of the strict liability law requiring full disclosure 41 days before the elections they are engaged in and did not do it. Councilwoman Benker made it clear in open forum last night she is calling the shots on election law interpretation last night, not the Charter Authority responsible for all law enforcement, the City Manager when she ignored the two complaints "pending" and chastised a legal entity for exercising its own Constitutional right to free speech by sponsoring candidates that Benker now wants to make unlawful. This very position by a City councilwoman is advocating socialized elections whereby the incumbents' job security is controlled by themselves, not the rule of law. She was seconded in that unlawful position by councilwoman Levinson. They want their cake and eat it too by controlling the rules instead of the Court determining who is guilty and not while tightly controlling the flow of information the public sees to make informed election decisions.

There is no separate law enforcement of the election law except by council cronyism. First and foremost, what is council doing as a block sponsoring political candidates in the first place? That is a socialism PAC per se and 100% conflict of interest because the members represent 100% of the people, not just a plurality. That should be addressed and forbidden in the Fair Practices Act and is not.

Secondly, pure travesties like the following are going un-investigated and un-reported to the detriment of justice under the rule of law and the undermining of democracy in the election process of the City of Longmont:

"Hi all,

We just got an interesting phone call on the campaign line. Apparently some of the homes in the Willow Creek Estates HOA who have Santos signs in their yard received a recorded message stating that they were in violation of the HOA rules by having a campaign sign displayed. The guy who called us is the President of that HOA, and the recording was absolutely NOT done by them.

They traced the # through caller ID to a cell phone that is registered to someone named Shauna Kelly Moore (not sure on spelling or absolute accuracy, he rattled it off quickly) with an address somewhere in Denver.

The HOA President did note that they have in the past had a homeowner who was disgruntled and in some way impersonated an HOA official previously, so they thought perhaps it is something like that. The other possibility, of course, being that someone is playing very dirty politics.

I have no idea what should be done with this info, and I told as much to the gentleman I spoke with. But I wanted to pass along the info in case anyone wants to do something with it, and certainly so we all can keep an ear out as to whether this is happening in other neighborhoods.

If anyone would like to talk with him further I can get you contact info. But really I just wanted to pass along info."

Mr. Mayor, I address your attention to your capacity jointly with the City Manager to represent the sovereign authority and the joint obligation of both offices to enforce the law irrespective, of the political power of individual council members who are abusing their power, to protect all of the People of Longmont, not just their political cronies who support socialism over capitalism. Therefore, I ask that the law be respected and enforced in order to maintain the trust in the integrity of the government election system itself as a friend of the City.

Very truly yours,

Richard Yale

CC: news media

Guidelines: Be kind. Abusive commentary may be removed. If you believe someone has been abusive, please click "Report Abuse".

SUBMIT COMMENT
Talk Back : submit comments to the story

*Note: you need to log-in to add a comment or rating.
Thank you! Your comment has been updated.
< BACK | NEXT >
Showing 1-10 of 16 comments

Rich, I'm independent. I've never been a member of any political party. Looks like your "substance" has no basis in fact.

Dear Chris Colelli, You can fool some of the public some of the time the voters tonight proved you can't fool all the people all the time with your judicial snake oil: Republicans should be convinced of the law, but good Democrats like yourself and rocket scientist Juday are immune because Democrats are elite. The silent majority wants better of their leaders irrespective of affiliation to political party. Longmont wins with the voter’s silver stake driven in the heart of the Boulder socialist takeover of Longmont City Council. The voters are telling you they are their own judges not the socialist elites with your political correctness and ends are the means B.S. Some of us write the truth for the betterment of the whole community; your comments so far are deficient in substance; making up for it are your personal attacks to compensate lack of substance in you plans for public policy that only includes those who think right with the socialist oligarchy.

Rich, I'm afraid your writings don't reflect badly on me at all. Stay on your meds, buddy.

When Colelli was Chairman of P&Z Commission he once presided as a quasi-judicial "judge", with Commissioners as jury in a test case of the new property code he & they were responsible for creating. Their Title 15 Land Use Code subordinated, everyone’s sacred right to private property ownership to communal control by Big City Government. This writer asked Mr. Colelli to speak in order to show conflict between T-15 and new Supreme Case law that would have cleared the property owner from further liability and allow him to proceed. But, “Judge” Colelli, the Infallible, presiding, ruled the Authority of the Constitution out of order in his official commission of City Council proceedings. He who denied justice to a fellow citizen then and whines today he was “popped by the law” then for his own negligence and charges “hypocrisy” at one who sought equal justice then and now is overcome by his own inconsistencies and acute paranoia from his common sense, derangement syndrome. [Remove]

My "Amen", as you call it, was me basically saying "enforce the law", isn't that what YOU'RE saying? Or is your problem that I appeared to agree with Rich? Bottom line: I can be a loyal friend or a fierce enemy - if you've got a problem with Rich, you've got a problem with me. If you're buds with Main St Free Press (where are they?) and Spagnolo (ditto?), you're talking to the wrong guy in me. I'm not a policy maker and hold no sway in city staff affairs, convincing me amounts to nothing. Either way, if you were unfairly discriminated against, good luck in your fight, seriously.

What? Am I saying that since I got popped, the ones you're talking about now shouldn't? I don't know how I can be so misread. I say every violator should be popped all of the time! I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of Rich coming out of the woodwork now but not in the past. And what "I'm after" is equal application of the current law, and a complete rewrite for a new law.

That was your fight, that was then. This is our fight, this is now. Can much be done about your situation now? I don't see how. Are you saying that since you got popped, the ones we're talking about now shouldnt? Because Pirnack wasnt they shouldnt either? It should be enforced equally, and when's the judge's trial, I'll check it out. You got plenty of ink/play from MSFP, doesnt sound like you were ignored by the City, what else are you after (that is remotely possible)? You aren't confusing me with someone who endlessly backs the city are you? You've got to be kidding.

Chris, my point is that you DID jump on something that you didn't know about. Rich was yammering on about alleged campaign violations from Hansen and Juday, and you jumped in with an "Amen". Rich should certainly know better, having run for mayor in '99, but Rich is blatantly partisan and is showing his selective attention to the FCPA. If you believe in enforcement of the FCPA, then I would expect to see that you knew more about it and that you would support charges against all who have violated it. Will you be at Judge Van De Hey's trial? Rich's meltdown over the composition of the new council is just pure entertainment. I suspect you are smarter than that. I'm serious about showing you the history of FCPA (non)enforcement in Longmont. Let me know when you'd like to meet. I guarantee it will be an issue again.

So Mr. Colelli, what is your main point here, that I or someone else didn't jump on something we either didn't know about, or maybe someone that knew more about it was handling it? (That would be you) So all those counts you mention about others just go away, and you are actually convicted? I'm sure this ordinance is written poorly, some are probably gaming the system, most aren't getting caught or punished. Apparently some are. You're right, I don't spend a bunch of time on someone I don't know who starts out with "Hey Chris".

Mr. Colelli, observes that the City Attorney does not work for the People of Longmont, but for the Council. If the Fair Practices Ordinance were actually administered and enforced independently of Council control, would not the perception of Council’s conflict of interest vanish? As it is, application of the ordinance & enforcement is politically malleable. Right now it is a case of the fox guarding the chicken coop and needs correction for confidence in the system to continue. The Ordinance should be fair, not discriminatory against professions, or political beliefs. Limitations on contributions should apply equally to community interests and be equally enforced. Meanwhile, the law is on the books and should be enforced until changed, what other Councils have done or not done has nothing to do with today’s obligation for the City to enforce the law and the candidates duty to obey the law.
Showing 1-10 of 16 comments
< BACK | NEXT >