register |  login
Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Tower

Embrace a New Vision for Union Reservoir
Contributed by: Kaye Fissinger on 1/18/2008

Longmont is an All-American City, an award we should all experience with pride. But Longmont's all-American status is more than an award. It is a microcosm of the nation as a whole with its dreams, hopes, and fears. Our choices will be influenced by forces and actions on a national, and indeed global, level. And our choices along with every other community in the country will influence our national future.

I'm reminded of the summary visions in Longmont's Open Space and Trails Plan. It reads: "Connecting our people with our natural resources, preserving our environment, defining our community, balancing our growth, treasuring our children's futures, protecting what we value." What a wonderful premise for the future of Longmont.

All too often there are those who would trample on our natural areas and wildlife habitats for the sake of questionable agendas. Here in Longmont, around the state, and throughout the nation some of the most environmentally valuable and sensitive land it repeatedly targeted for exploitation. Locally, this applies to Union Reservoir.

Union Reservoir serves many important purposes. It is a major repository for water for reuse as vital potable drinking water, irrigation and water exchange; and Longmont is to be commended for its foresight in purchasing the controlling interest.

Union Reservoir serves important recreational uses including swimming, picnicking, fishing and limited other activities. Thus far, wildlife seems to have adapted to this level of human activity. But planned exploitation of the area in Weld County will damage the environment for humans and severely threaten wildlife habitats.

There is the presumption that Union Reservoir will need to be expanded at some time in the future. The Longmont City Council needs to thoroughly reexamine the existing plans. It should search for the assumptions, written and unwritten, that are the foundation of those plans. Is the vision for Union Reservoir and the surrounding acreage reflected in those plans appropriate for Longmont's future needs, challenges, and values?

The plans for expansion as they now exist call for a 13' expansion of the Reservoir using berming and damming. At a recent city council meeting, Councilmember Levison pointed out that this would entail a 25' structure on the southern edge if the expansion does not inundate surrounding properties. It is my genuine belief that only a very few of the citizens of Longmont would endorse this approach.

I would like to offer an alternative vision. This vision assumes expansion of the Reservoir and the preservation of existing recreational activities, but rejects the unnatural, unsightly structures and urbanization that other plans have proposed.

I envision the Union Reservoir as a blend of low-impact district park and wildlife preserve. I envision the expansion inundating the surrounding acreage to maintain a natural environment. I envision not only the replacement of lost wetlands but the creation of additional wetlands. I envision the planting of large groves of cottonwoods to preserve and encourage the nesting and roosting of the bald eagle. I envision additional groves of trees native to Colorado and the Rockies in clusters throughout the surrounding area. I envision native flora to enhance the beauty of the area. I envision open space protected from urban lighting in order to enjoy clear skies and bright stars. I envision a multitude of trails for quiet communing with nature. I envision secluded areas for meditation and reflection. I envision large, unfragmented, diverse and complex habitats buffered from intensive human use that are able to support more species and more of them. I envision an environment with clean, fresh air. And I envision an environment that will be a wonderful place for Longmont's citizens and visitors alike to experience and enjoy. I hope you will embrace my vision.




SUBMIT COMMENT

Rate the above story



Current Rating

Based on 14 user ratings.

Talk Back : submit comments to the story

*Note: you need to log-in to add a comment or rating.

< BACK | NEXT >
Showing 1-10 of 12 comments
Submitted By: David Larison
posted on 1/21/2008 @ 8:48:58 PM
Rated Story
I'm just repeating facts that Duane Leise has stated publicly at City Council meetings. And besides, Leise is the one who exhorted us to talk facts and strategies here.
Submitted By: Bing Van Gorden
posted on 1/21/2008 @ 3:44:28 PM
Rated Story
Mr. Larison, why would you resort to prying into someone's personal life and posting it on a public blog? Just because you can do something, doesn't make it an acceptable practice. You really have no ethical reason to do so and most likely don't have a full picture of the individual to make a judgment do you? Pretty shameful sir, I must say.
Submitted By: Bing Van Gorden
posted on 1/21/2008 @ 3:41:43 PM
Rated Story
Because Stephanie the reference to the award is minor compared to the content of this post as a whole. I am not as concerned with that first line as I am with the overall theme that was written here. A theme that did not take pot shots, wasn't mean spirited but was simply a person's opinion. That you chose to focus on something as insignificant and to do it rather nastily was petty in my view. I found the Award so insignificant I didn't bother to look it up. I did say "probably" a poor choice of words on my part because in reality I am ambivalent to it. I don't care either way who gave it to us but shouldn't have implied one way or the other either.
Submitted By: Doug Wray
posted on 1/20/2008 @ 10:35:29 PM
Rated Story
Forget about it Ralph, it's Longtown. (name that movie!)
Submitted By: Ralph Dosser
posted on 1/20/2008 @ 8:17:36 PM
Rated Story
Hear, hear! Well spoken, Kaye. Lot of crazy people posting here, though.
Submitted By: David Larison
posted on 1/20/2008 @ 12:09:12 PM
Rated Story
Tell me Duane Leise, if you think it's so funny that Boulder's no-growth extremism could spread to Longmont, then why did you sell your $500,000 home in Boulder to move to Weld County with its despised sprawl? (OUTSIDE of Longmont). What's the matter, did the Progressives and their Boulder nannystate hit you in the ol' pocketbook?
Submitted By: Duane Leise
posted on 1/19/2008 @ 11:46:02 AM
Rated Story
Stephanie - An award is about the past. I search for the future. Awards are many times lobbied for and can be nothing but a game. Given the choice between an award and cash I'll take cash every time. Democracy is about the people taking control and contributing to their own welfare. -------------------- I for one believe that Longmont can be greater than it is and is not destined to forever follow the same path as the past. If after a year or two and we get to see the track record of the new council and there are problems then we look in other directions. For you to be fighting them before they have a track record is OBVIOUSLY partisan and unnecessarily contentious. Please STOP. Lets get into the issues, facts and strategies to move into the future. please
Submitted By: Duane Leise
posted on 1/19/2008 @ 11:31:31 AM
Rated Story
Annexation of Longmont by Boulder. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha. Get real. It is all I can do from calling you terms that are appropriate. Get out of here. If you can't argue your points you are of no value to this discussion. I personally have had it. You either put up or shut up. Answering you and S Baum is a waste of my time I have better things to do. Like bring jobs to Longmont. Figuring out how to avoid the pain of the coming recession and heal the housing market. Protect the earth. Loving wild life. Be caring and loving to those who are making the effort to be in life. etc. etc. ------- Oh, begone from me XXXXX!
Submitted By: Farid Tabaz
posted on 1/18/2008 @ 6:32:40 PM
Rated Story
stop the insanity. stop the annexation of Longmont by Boulder radicals. longmontreport.com
Submitted By: Stephanie Baum
posted on 1/18/2008 @ 1:09:46 PM
Rated Story
Bing, how is my point not relevant when Kaye's first sentence is, "Longmont is an All-American City, an award we should all experience with pride." Or did you not actually read the article? And because you asked, the award is given by the National Civic League (www.ncl.org). This is how they describe themselves, "America's original advocate for community democracy. It is a non-profit, non-partisan, membership organization dedicated to strengthening citizen democracy by transforming democratic institutions." And their history? "NCL was founded in 1894, when more than 100 educators, journalists, business leaders, and policy makers met in Philadelphia to discuss the future of American cities." To me sounds like YOUR kind of people. Not a "business group of some sort" as you believed.
Showing 1-10 of 12 comments
< BACK | NEXT >
CONTRIBUTOR INFORMATION

Kaye Fissinger

Longmont , CO

Kaye Fissinger has posted 16 stories and 44 comments since joining on 9/6/2007. Kaye Fissinger 's average story rating is 3.3.
SAVE AND SHARE THIS STORY
STORY RSS FEEDS
WANT TO WRITE FOR YOURHUB.COM?
Want to see the stories you write and the photos you shoot featured in the YourHub.com Thursday print section available all over the Front Range and with home subscriptions of the Rocky Mountain News and The Denver Post? All you have to do is register, then post a story or column, start a blog or tell everyone what events are happening in town. We will print the best stories, columns, event listings, photos and blog entries in our print sections.

ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad

Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad