Search by keyword or six-digit Content ID


What's Hot

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Longmont [Change Location]

Let's get our votes to count


Boulder County voters can't vote in national elections. Not as long as we use the Hart/InterCivic Ballot Now system. So many of us wanted paper ballots. Few wanted electronic methods. Paper ballots seemed to be so secure, while elections by computer has been proven in so many ways to be insecure. Okay, so the county government listened to the demands of the voters and purchased a new paper system. Its really a computer system, but it deals with paper ballots.

Then came the 2004 general election, which took 63 hours to tally. More than two days to come to any sort of conclusion. We know that we held up the state in elections reporting. Everyone wanted to know why? The ballots were screwed up and the scanners had trouble reading them. That's why. A six month study of the cause was described as a virtual train wreck. Everything that could go wrong did. No one expected what happened and the procedures didn't cover bad ballots.

We had four years of practice with new staff and various technological fixes. Since the ballots were still paper it might have been assumed that they could be counted by hand, if the train left the tracks again.

In 07 the Secretary of State de-certified the paper ballot system that we have. The marks on the ballots used by the computerized scanning system violates the state constitution. There were many reasons to replace the Hart system, but it wasn't replaced. More money and time was spent on fixing this thing that doesn't work very well. Boulder County had spent nearly $4M on the hardware and who knows how much on the labor to support its failures.

In our recent general election, county voters were only able to vote on local issues and candidates. Our votes for federal offices didn't really count. Our votes for president weren't included in the final tally with the rest of Colorado. They were still being counted until last week. More massive failures, higher labor costs and a technological nightmare.

Who could know? It's been the hue and cry of our local government leaders. More time and money will be spent to figure out what to do before the next election. How about replacing it with a paper ballot system that can read ballots without breaking the law or employing a huge squad of fixers? That's too simple and too inexpensive, and way too obvious.

For the next four years we'll get to practice getting right, just like we did between 04 and 08. Do other counties need to practice to get it right? Why do we care what the other 63 counties are doing? Well, we certainly can take their elections as an example. They got to vote for president and US senate. We didn't.

Guidelines: Be kind. Abusive commentary may be removed. If you believe someone has been abusive, please click "Report Abuse".

SUBMIT COMMENT
Talk Back : submit comments to the story

*Note: you need to log-in to add a comment or rating.
Thank you! Your comment has been updated.
Showing 1-7 of 7 comments

Excellent work Paul! :o))

Perhaps the term 'training' would be appropriate? There are many activities that simply cannot be mastered without training, especially those that might occur infrequently, like elections, car wrecks, structure fires, etc. That being said, this stuff is not rocket science. We all learned to count high numbers by, what, the 3rd or 4th grade? Good point, too, about the other 63 counties that had no trouble. We should just do what they do instead of trying to be different. Diversity is bad in these cases.

Before the special council election in January I propsed to council that we count our election by hand. We should practice. I warned that the Boulder system was threatened with decertification. Mike Coffman tried, but political forces in PRB said it was Coffman being a Republic dick and leveraged it back into use. Mary Blue recognized that the folks that wanted hand counted paper ballots were from outside of Longmont (except for me) and council agreed that it wasn't an issue that they wanted to tackle. Maybe not all, because Roger and I were on the countywide ballot in 04, which was a mess. Wonder if there will be support for this now?

So at what point does asking about someone become stalking? 2 sites? 3 sites? Good article, Paul.

Doug, I’ve been laughing until I was crying at the County tech geeks who didn’t know that moving high volumes of paper ballots makes dust. Then their discovery that dust obscures scanners. Then they hired gosh knows how many people to compensate for what machines can’t do at $100 a day per person on top of the massive waste of money blown on equipment that can’t do the job reliably anyway. Top those laughs off with the Clerk separating individual ballots from individual accountability envelopes the tech geek’s 2nd surprise came when some total precinct votes cast on Election Day didn’t match the total votes cast. Not to worry, say those causing the election count disaster, three plus weeks to do what was done by hand in less than 24 hours before is the price to pay for progress in the PRB. No wonder the State gave up on the PRB, and you & me & everyone else was disenfranchised in the National Election.

This is a wake up call to Longmont, Louisville & Lafayette that they have been disenfranchised by the People's Republic of Boulder again and its time to form our own County that will represent outlanders from Boulder.

An excellent analysis, Paul. Will the listen to reason? Computer driven balloting & counting is obviously over the heads of Boulder County's elected officials to manage and accurately verify in a timely manner with the rest of the counties in the State. Mail in ballots should only be allowed to active duty military and persons, who plan ahead, present IDs and pick up ballots from County offices. Early voting should be controlled exactly as on election day; come in present ID, voting & ballot security should be under controlled conditions so the process is uniform, fair and accurate.
Showing 1-7 of 7 comments