register |  login
Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Tower

FasTracks & Longmont Council Flush tax dollars
Contributed by: Richard Yale on 7/18/2008

In case you didn't see it, Boulder's Bob Greenlee had a superb commentary on FasTracks in last Sunday's Daily Camera.

In summary: The NW Corridor plan has devolved to a case of the emperor has no clothes! If Council is really concerned about doing something to make economic and work commute conditions actually better, not worse; it will separate FasTracks from urban renewal in southern downtown instead of flushing hard earned tax payer dollars down the toilet. They can locatea modest beginning and terminal site at or about Twin Peaks Mall.Council can trash can the Longmont City Council/RTD FasTrack plans to ruin lives and businesses on the South side of First Avenue between Main Street and the Terry Street Overpass which will make a better community and Longmont a better place without the blight of FasTracks underdevelopments.

Historically Longmont's previous City Council promised many times over to many citizens individually and collectively it would never use eminent domain in its urban renewal projects of which the FasTracks lower downtown train station is a part of. But, this Council in its infinite wisdom handed over its power of eminent domain - the 'legal' ability to take private property for public & private uses - to RTD for the FasTracks projects to take to take the entire neighborhood on the South side of First Avenue East from Main Street West to the Terry Street Rail Road Overpass for its own and eventual private development under Longmont's Urban Renewal Project. With the release of partial FasTrack plans a few weeks ago concerning Southern downtown, the specter of condemnation hangs over all property in the area contrary to "Government's word of honor." Ha.

As Longmont's betrayed citizens are finding out, who appoints judges to the Supreme Court is the key to whether they lose their Freedoms to misleading politicians. Government's awesome power of eminent domain can be used to cover up boondoggles like FasTracks and its corrupted agenda justified by taking private property against the owner's will with the nebulous claim of "economic development." This planning boondoggle that historically hasput Longmont's South downtown properties in blight for over two decades now has all homeowners and businesses in the area in trouble with the FasTracks uncertainly ruining lives and the economysome Longmontpoliticians claim they are "helping".

The U.S. Supreme Court may have ruled but the fight may not be over yet with the Emperor's exposure in Longmont. Excerpts from the Boulder Camera article: http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2008/jul/13/fastracks-derailed/

"FasTracks was oversold to the voters, the cost of building what was promised keeps going up, and the original plan pledged to the voters will never be built... You might recall that in order to sell the FasTracks scheme to voters, every nook and cranny ser BNSF won't let RTD use their tracks between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m.. Duh! After all, the tracks primary function is to move freight; not a handful of rail fans who could just as easily take the bus to wherever they need to go.ved by the RTD had to get its share of goodies...Longmont was promised 'Commuter rail'... Instead, we're going to get to share the freight train tracks owned by the Burlington Northern Railroad who-if everyone were willing to be honest-don't give a damn about having heavy rail passenger trains on their freight tracks... adding a second set of tracks is a $45-50 million deal.,. the whole FasTracks scheme is already escalating in price from its original estimate of $4.7 billion to around $6.1 billion. That new estimate was made over a year ago and if anyone thinks we're not going to see that figure rise dramatically they're not paying attention to reality... One solution is to eliminate the Northwest heavy rail plan. It's not needed! Boulder County's FasTrack needs can easily be accommodated by increasing the existing Bus Rapid Transit option."




SUBMIT COMMENT

Rate the above story



Current Rating

Based on 11 user ratings.

Talk Back : submit comments to the story

*Note: you need to log-in to add a comment or rating.

Showing 1-5 of 5 comments
Submitted By: Chris Rodriguez
posted on 7/22/2008 @ 12:22:26 AM
Rated Story
The meltdown continues: http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/jul/21/mayors-stand-their-ground-no-fastracks-cuts/ Time to cut our losses.
Submitted By: Richard Yale
posted on 7/20/2008 @ 5:30:54 PM
Rated Story
The FasTracks mess in the NW Corridor was so politically corrupt from its inception that as it comes under increased scrutiny from all directions by dominant media including this front page story in the Rocky Mountain News yesterday: http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/jul/18/fastracks-budget-off-rails/ I doubt it will ever be built, or even the whole metro concept as presently planned. Do the readers really want to pay a full 1.0% sales tax for getting table scraps on the northern fringe of the district? In Longmont thanks to City Council, we're not only destined for a lousy deal with the FasTracks plan and to pay the same hefty sales tax as someone living in central Denver that has been using light rail for more than five years; but we are expected to pay for the bloc’s corruption to move the Coffman Street Substation for private developers plans & enrichment. This is what the new activist liberal City government is all about: destroy the economy & make the marks pay for it.
Submitted By: Chris Rodriguez
posted on 7/20/2008 @ 12:40:18 PM
Rated Story
Did you see: http://www.9news.com/news/local/article.aspx?storyid=96095&catid=346 and there was another on News4 last night. I think Longmon't spur is about to get thrown under the bus, or the first to be cut.
Submitted By: Richard Yale
posted on 7/18/2008 @ 7:15:15 PM
Rated Story
Government works by all citizens respecting 1) the Constitution and 2. all elected, appointed and judicial officials respecting their personal Constitutional Oaths of Office in the performance of their official duties. In that Spirit, not political animosity, the previous Council promised not to break the intent and promises of Constitutional equal protection for all property owners and in reliance of this promise effected concerned Citizens gave their Consent to the project. If citizens cannot trust Government when they give Consent, then the City no longer has Government by Consent by the People and who can they trust? Instead of sticking to commenting on ideas and incidents, the personal attack inherent with the posted comment is demonstrable disrespect for YourHub’s Denver Metro Editor as well as for all of YourHub readers by the poster.
Submitted By: Ralph Dosser
posted on 7/18/2008 @ 4:30:13 PM
Rated Story
Mr. Yale holds the current city council responsible for breaking the "promise" of a previous city council. What if any given city council promised, say, to never allow firemen to work on Sundays? Would all future councils be bound by that? That's not even remotely how governance works. It's an insane suggestion, even considering who the author is.
Showing 1-5 of 5 comments
CONTRIBUTOR INFORMATION

Richard Yale

Longmont , CO

Richard Yale has posted 53 stories and 111 comments since joining on 12/13/2007. Richard Yale 's average story rating is 4.1.
SAVE AND SHARE THIS STORY
STORY RSS FEEDS
WANT TO WRITE FOR YOURHUB.COM?
Want to see the stories you write and the photos you shoot featured in the YourHub.com Thursday print section available all over the Front Range and with home subscriptions of the Rocky Mountain News and The Denver Post? All you have to do is register, then post a story or column, start a blog or tell everyone what events are happening in town. We will print the best stories, columns, event listings, photos and blog entries in our print sections.

ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad

Loading Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Ad