Search by keyword or six-digit Content ID


What's Hot

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Thornton [Change Location]

Blog Entry 34 of 67 Northglenn Revealed
The City of Northglenn has a unique character for the North Metro Area. It seems it is always out of step with the neighbors. Sometimes ahead and sometimes not. I hope my efforts and some meaningful dialog will keep the community stable, secure and an asset to the area.

RTD to force a station On Northglenn?


If RTD eventually decides to locate a rail station at 112th Ave. in Northglenn, the Board of Directors will have complied with the strongly stated wishes of: District K Board Member, Noel Busck, RTD General Manager, Cal Marsella, and Assistant Manager for Planning and Development, Liz Rao. All three leaders have made their opinion known on this possible site. RTD has the final decision making authority on all station locations.

If RTD decides to place a station at the location, every resident of the city will be impacted. Our city will be required to reimburse RTD two percent of all capital development costs. This will include the costs associated with the land, parking facilities, structures, planning and development expenses and such. The large amount of money required to meet this obligation will require the cancellation or deferral of services and improvements financed by the General Fund.

The placement of a station on the site will also permit the placement of a large sign on the structure which says, Northglenn. Having such a sign, "plaque", is a very big incentive for some of our leaders and residents. They see it as a source of pride for the city and a legacy for some before they leave office.

At the Fastracks Open House on March 21st the subject of your involvement was mentioned. I heard one person say that only residents close to the station site should have a say in the Environmental Impact Study. Specifically, that residents close to and west of I-25 should not be involved in any manner. I also heard a member of the city council say that this is a community wide issue and those not residing near the site should and do have an equal stake in the locating of a station.

This little debate is leading to a future council agenda item. The council created Task Force was composed of volunteers. A vast majority of them were residents who lived close to the possible station. It recommended that the city oppose the 112th station site. It is very possible that the Council will encourage residents from across the city to provide additional input through a variety of means in order to mitigate the recommendation.

There is another unrelated but parallel issue before the Council and you; the Recreation Center. In last fall's city-wide survey of residents, only six percent of the residents stated that they used the center monthly or more often. In the recent public process leading towards a determination of the Center's fate, forty-five percent of the participants stated that they used the center monthly or more often.

If the rail station task force was bias and more input is desired, consistency demands a further review of the current recommendations on the center for the same reason.

Gene Wieneke has lived in Northglenn since 1994. He previously served on the Northglenn Urban Renewal Authority and currently serves on the board of adjustment.

Guidelines: Be kind. Abusive commentary may be removed. If you believe someone has been abusive, please click "Report Abuse".

SUBMIT COMMENT
Talk Back : submit comments to the blog

*Note: you need to log-in to add a comment or rating.
Thank you! Your comment has been updated.
Showing 1-2 of 2 comments

Oh, and of course your residents in Northglenn won't use this RTD service, at all - will they? Your nothing more than a vocal MINORITY. The MAJORITY of your fellow Northglennians do want this station for their convenience (they are paying for it after all), they just simply don't care to get politically involved, because their too darn busy with everything else in their life. You, on the other hand, have no life and evidently no brain either!

Citizens are concerned when they don't know the impact on their lives. They may assume that there will be a negative impact on traffic, noise-levels, and property taxes. If various plans can be presented, which show how this can be positive for close-by and far-out citizens, then it may be better received. I would think that it best to discuss the matter. Step 1 - capture all of the concerns, and then eventually work out the problems so that this is acceptable to the citizens. I still have family that lives within a mile of this proposed station, and I would think that due diligence is owed them to ensure their concerns are not only considered, but used to foster a workable solution. Personally I'm concerned with the traffic over the 112th bridge and at the intersections. These intersections would have to be redesigned to process traffic a lot better so that folks don't have to wait 2 or 3 light-changes to get through.
Showing 1-2 of 2 comments