What changes? I have asked this question numerous times. I say that nothing really changes. The reason that language changes is because people misinterpret the language. As time progresses so does language. Its like a river. The river always looks the same but the same water never passes twice.

Interviews are suppost to be the most important part of anything, but really I don't see much importance in interviews. First impression is the most important thing. This is because people understand you after one meeting. The reason that first impressions are important is because it is your impression. Its not like your impression is going to change the next time you meet someone. They already know who you are with the first meeting. The reason that anybody would have more than one interview is because they want to see if they can handle you. After the first interview, the interviewer is more or less interviewing himself. This is because he wants to see if he can handle you. This works with any relationship that you can have. Nothing really changes. What changes is someones interpretation of a subject. The subject really never changes. Nothing changes.

I may have radical thoughts (maybe not, I don't know), but its not like the subjects that I'm talking about change once I have spoken but I have spoken with different words and rhythms that allow for a different perspective. How can one thing be bad and good at the same time? How can someone hate me and the next person love me? What does that make me? Who's perspective should you listen to?

I don't listen to people. People just are just telling me their life story. Is my story the same? Accounting rules are precise and are never meant to change but they change all the time. This is because a new story is created. If the story doesn't overlap the rules already in place, then it must mean that your perspective isn't fully right. How can people argue? If one person is so right, how can someone not be rational enough themselves to also be right? Is there really such thing as right and wrong?

If someone believes in themselves, and this comes with age, shouldn't they be right? But if I don't agree with them and I believe in myself, then I can't be wrong either. So, what is judgment? Is it looking at something and seeing a difference? Or is it really that someone is wrong?

When someone tells you a story, are they just talking? Or are you suppost to be learning something? Everyone is suppost to learn and it doesn't stop until you die. If someone really knows everything when they die, how can they accept dieing? Dieing proves that no one is right or wrong. All it proves is that we don't know.

Until we live forever, we will never be right. This is why a heaven gives the mind a calm state of mind. It allows us to believe that we will know everything at some point in time. Knowledge is also fake. Intelligence is fake. All we have is communication. The only people that are remembered are the people who communicate. So, in order to be smart, this is what you need to do. You need to formulate stories. You need to make stories that no one will ever be able to recreate. Once your story is recreated you have lost your best form of communication. The reason why someone is right and wrong is because most people don't know what stories to say. So, they ask people what are the right stories to tell. If people don't want to hear your story then that is the only time you really can be "wrong". If you bloggers don't want to hear my words anymore, then I have lost all my intelligence. You can't be smart unless you can tell people that you are smart. I need a school to tell me I'm smart enough to graduate from college, but everyone graduates from college, so what does college really mean to me? Is intelligence really a degree or is it something else?

Communication is the way we live. It isn't a form of intelligence or a form of living. It is what we are. We couldn't live with out communication. We have nerves on the micro level. We have black holes on the macro level. Then there is speech, hooting, growling, tweeting, and sonic bombs. All we are is our senses, and this is how we explain intelligence. The more noise you make, the more trouble you make, the more things you make, the more powerful you are.

So, in order to be smart and to prove to people who I am, I need to be everything and everyone. I need to have people know me. Paris Hilton is a good example. She is extremely powerful. She is more powerful than me, and I would say that I could beat her one-on-one in anything. But she has the whole world following her. If you (the reader) would see me and her in the street and we are about be hit by a car. You only could save one person, you would save Paris Hilton. Now that is power. Paris Hilton is more powerful than I will ever be. Power is consumption and communication. If you can do both extremely well then you are the leader.

If you can speak, you are a leader. If you listen you are a follower. But I couldn't have been able to speak (or type) like I do if I didn't listen for sometime. When you speak you corrupt and disturb. When you listen you consume. In order to build a house, I have to disturb the forest and cut down a tree and then consume the tree. Communication is the only form of intelligence. If the best lobbyist in the world goes mute, then he losses his communication skills and loses his power.

If you want to succeed. Let me tell you what to do. Annoy, disturb, bother, do your best to corrupt the world. This gives you responsibility for the things that you did. The more responsibility you have the more power and money you have. If your nervous about doing something, go ahead and do it. Fix it later. The more things that you can break and fix, the more responsibility you have and the more power you have. Annoy until you succeed.